![]() On any given month the DP content usually outnumbers the non DP content somewhere around 3 to 1. And in the same time 4 new studios have been brought in that pretty much exclusively makes DP scenes. They might even have stopped the production of this line completely since there is yet no evidence that any new scenes has been shot since last year. ![]() Gonzo studio has decreased the output of their "0% pussy" scenes. I think this shift has been carefully planed and prepared by xxx during the last years by gradually and greatly increasing the output of DP scenes. They majority of DDF scenes are vaginal, and even the scenes that has anal usually has more pussy sex than anal in them. Now with this DDF extra content LP is clearly shifting in a new direction. Even if those scenes where softer, and a few of them even was vaginal scenes, the main focus was always on anal sex. We have had that before with "First Gape" and Giorgios classic Russian scenes. I am perfectly fine with extra bonus content i have no complaints against that. Simplifying even further, the content is not my issue it is the exclusivity of the scene as a DDF membership it would be cheaper to get than buying these scenes on LP. LP tickets are to scarce and valuable to spend on non-exclusive content that we can get essentially for free with a DDF membership. Restating, I would join DDF during its $10 promotion for its more LP aligned studio like "Hands on Hardcore", "House of Taboo" and "Euro Teen Erotica" with the bonus that I get those scenes that LP is trying to sell for free. ![]() I could easily wait for DDF to run a membership promotion and get the same scenes as part of my subscription that on LP cost us on a per scene basis to own. I thought these were original LP content just not as hard as most the scenes being produced now but why would I pay on per scene basis for a scene that on DDF I get essentially for free with my membership. ![]() Now after I have read some of the other forum members comments and taking a look at the DDF content it doesn't make any sense to me as a LP member. I honestly didn't mind this change in LP which seems to be an obvious move to slow LP path to the next disgusting fetish like vomit BJ and Scat. You wouldn't scream at the local McDonalds manager for serving apple pies if you hate apple pies. Pretty simple rule to use at McDonalds or Legal Porno. And one of them is causing all this outrage? Are you all rich and retired and never leave the house so you watch all 18 scenes in 2 days and are angry?īuy the shit you like, dont buy the shit you don't like. There were NINETEEN SCENES RELEASED IN THE FIRST 6 DAYS OF JUNE. Adding extra scenes adds new ones, or gives people like myself some variety for a change. If they reduce DAP and replace it with lesbian scenes, they lose most of their customers. So what if this is the first step tp profit optimization by curbing down LP anal niche fetish output? Sales rates in June already provide such info.Īlso selling DDF using LP just as a platform might increase DDF sales. I mean solo/mast can be produced with much lower investments, thus they dont have to sell that good to make profit still. Dap-addict wrote:CanadianCouple, and what is if this Glam Porn stuff is now just a trial with additional scenes, but if they reasonably sell, traditional LP scenes (GIO, gonzo, IV) get replaced by them later?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |